Dissociative Identity Disorder: A Review of Research From 2011 to 2021.

ABSTRACT: Dissociative identity disorder (DID) has historically been one of the most controversial topics in the study of psychopathology. Building on a previous review of empirical research on DID from 2000 to 2010, the present review examined DID research from 2011 to 2021. The research output included 56 case studies and 104 empirical studies. Within the empirical studies, approximately 1354 new cases of DID emerged, which resulted in an average samples of approximately 20. Reanalysis of previous samples was standard in the literature with only 40% of reported cases being new. Studies emerged from dozens of countries across the world, but the majority of cases were from Western counties, especially the United States. Diagnosis primarily relied upon validated measures, but 74% of all new cases came from six research groups. Overall, research on DID is steady but methodologically limited in ways that make generalization, especially about etiology, difficult.

Treatment of dissociative identity disorder: leveraging neurobiology to optimize success.

INTRODUCTION: Dissociative identity disorder (DID) is a treatable mental health condition that is associated with a range of psychobiological manifestations. However, historical controversy, modern day misunderstanding, and lack of professional education have prevented accurate treatment information from reaching most clinicians and patients. These obstacles also have slowed empirical efforts to improve treatment outcomes for people with DID. Emerging neurobiological findings in DID provide essential information that can be used to improve treatment outcomes. AREAS COVERED: In this narrative review, the authors discuss symptom characteristics of DID, including dissociative self-states. Current treatment approaches are described, focusing on empirically supported psychotherapeutic interventions for DID and pharmacological agents targeting dissociative symptoms in other conditions. Neurobiological correlates of DID are reviewed, including recent research aimed at identifying a neural signature of DID. EXPERT OPINION: Now is the time to move beyond historical controversy and focus on improving DID treatment availability and efficacy. Neurobiological findings could optimize treatment by reducing shame, aiding assessment, providing novel interventional brain targets and guiding novel pharmacologic and psychotherapeutic interventions. The inclusion of those with lived experience in the design, planning and interpretation of research investigations is another powerful way to improve health outcomes for those with DID.

Dissociative Identity Disorder: Between History and Culture.

The Dissociative Identity Disorder has undergone significant transformations over the years. Once regarded as a rare condition, it gained popularity in the 1980s in the United States following the publication of a book on the subject, only to subsequently wane due to extensive controversies. Presently, we are witnessing a resurgence of adolescents who believe they may be afflicted by this disorder. This article delves into the changes that have occurred since the initial surge in 1980, with a particular focus on the role of social media in the dissemination of Dissociative Identity Disorder. The concepts of Mass Social Media-Induced Illness and Munchausen's by Internet are explored to elucidate this phenomenon. Additionally, we examine the criteria essential for distinguishing imitative Dissociative Identity Disorder from genuine cases, with the aim of aiding accurate diagnosis by psychiatrists. Mental health professionals may encounter new challenges when assessing young adults whose presentations are influenced by social media, necessitating awareness of the impact of social media on the dissemination of certain disorders.

Dissociative identity disorder as interdisciplinary problem. Part I - psychiatric and psychological aspects. / Dysocjacyjne zaburzenie tozsamosci jako problem interdyscyplinarny. Czesc I ­ aspekty psychiatryczne i psychologiczne.

Dissociative identity disorder (DID) belongs to the complicated issues of psychiatry and psychology areas. The specificity of the disorder and its clinical picture imply numerous difficulties in the diagnosis and treatment process. The diagnosis of DID can also have significant legal consequences, especially in the context of criminal liability or the general ability to be a witness. Thus, DID is an interdisciplinary problem. In practice, DID is rarely diagnosed, although it is estimated that it occurs in about 1% of the general population. In many cases, the period from the first contact with the healthcare system to a correct diagnosis exceeds several years (on average, 6.7 to 8 years). The average misdiagnosis rate is 2.8 per patient. The lack of a quick and proper diagnosis makes it impossible to undertake adequate treatment, which extends the entire therapeutic process, affects its effectiveness and significantly increases costs. There is no doubt that in educating psychiatrists and clinical psychologists, greater emphasis should be placed on correctly detecting dissociative symptoms and the use of adequate diagnostic tools. The aim of this article is to present and identify the main problems that DID implies in the diagnostic and therapeutic (psychological and psychiatric) areas. The article discusses the existing diagnostic tools, the issues of comorbidity and the causes of incorrect diagnoses. The issues of false-positive diagnoses and difficulties in differentiating patients with DID from simulators were also discussed. The primary mistakes made during the therapy, such as the strategy of minimization or the actions leading to multiple therapist disorder, were analyzed. Legal aspects will be presented in a separate article.

[Dissociative identity disorder in adolescents: From self-diagnosis to transient illness]. / Trouble dissociatif de l'identité de l'adolescent : de l'autodiagnostic à la maladie transitoire.

The category of dissociative identity disorder (DID) has puzzled medical science and fascinated popular culture for almost 200 years. Its occurrence in young people raises at least two new questions addressed by science studies and embedded philosophy: self-diagnosis (related to cyberchondria and mass media-induced illness) and transient disease (related to looping effect and identity claim specific to adolescence). In an attempt to refine the sociocognitive model, we analyze the impact of these notions in understanding the local ecological niche in which contemporary adolescent DID occurs.

Distinguishing clinical and simulated dissociative identity disorder using the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with dissociative identity disorder (DID) experience severe and broad-ranging symptoms which can be associated with elevations on measures designed to detect feigning and/or malingering. Research is needed to determine how to distinguish genuine DID from simulated DID on assessment measures and validity scales. OBJECTIVE: This study examined whether the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST), a screening measure of malingering, could differentiate between individuals with DID and DID simulators. METHOD: Thirty-five individuals with clinical, validated DID were compared to 88 individuals attempting to simulate DID on the M-FAST. A MANCOVA compared the two groups on total M-FAST score and subscales. Univariate ANCOVA's examined differences between the groups. A series of logistic regressions were conducted to determine whether group status predicted the classification of malingering. Utility statistics evaluated how well the M-FAST discerned clinical and simulated DID. RESULTS: The M-FAST correctly classified 82.9% of individuals with DID as not malingering when using the suggested cut-off score of six. However, utilizing a cut-off score of seven correctly classified 93.6% of all participants and maintained adequate sensitivity (.96) but demonstrated increased specificity (.89). CONCLUSIONS: The M-FAST shows promise in distinguishing genuine DID when the cut-off score is increased to seven. This study adds to the growing body of literature identifying tests that can adequately distinguish clinical from simulated DID. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Diagnostic considerations in a 16-year-old girl with multiple personalities.

This case report describes a 16-year-old patient, who presented with multiple personalities. A diagnosis of dissociative identity disorder (DID) was considered, but rejected, based on the patient's presenting psychopathology and a lack of confidence in the current scientific literature describing the diagnosis. DID is a rare diagnosis in Danish clinical practice and there is much dissent concerning its validity.

[A patient with dissociative identity disorder]. / Een patiënt met een dissociatieve identiteitsstoornis.

A 33-year-old woman presented at the department for anxiety therapy of a centre for special care dentistry. She had been referred there by a GP because she suffered from dental anxiety. In addition to the dental anxiety she was known to suffer from dissociative identity disorder. This unusual disorder is characterized by multiple personality conditions or identities. This can be of influence on both the dental treatment and the anxiety therapy. The treatment in the case of this patient consisted of Schema therapy at a Dutch mental healthcare facility and it seemed possible to work on her dental anxiety there. The disorder influenced the anxiety therapy because the patient would switch between personalities.

The utility of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology for distinguishing individuals with Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) from DID simulators and healthy controls.

Background: Individuals with dissociative identity disorder (DID) have complex symptoms consistent with severe traumatic reactions. Clinicians and forensic assessors are challenged by distinguishing symptom exaggeration and feigning from genuine symptoms among these individuals. This task may be aided by administering validity measures. Objective: This study aimed to document how individuals with DID score on the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). The second objective was to compare coached DID simulators and healthy controls to DID patients on the SIMS's total score and subscales. The third objective was to examine the utility rates of the SIMS in distinguishing simulated DID from clinically diagnosed DID. Method: We compared SIMS data gathered from participants from two Dutch sites, one Swiss site and one U.S. site. Sixty-three DID patients were compared to 77 coached DID simulators and 64 healthy controls on the SIMS. A multivariate analysis compared the groups on the SIMS total scores and subscales, and post-hoc Games Howell tests and univariate ANOVAs examined differences between the groups. Utility statistics assessed the accuracy of the SIMS in distinguishing clinical from simulated DID. Results: DID simulators scored significantly higher than DID individuals and healthy controls on every SIMS subscale as well as the total score. The majority (85.7%) of the individuals with DID scored above the cut-off, which is typically interpreted as indicative of possible symptom exaggeration. DID individuals scored higher than the healthy controls on every subscale except Low Intelligence, even after controlling for dissociation. The subscales and items most frequently endorsed by the DID group are consistent with symptoms associated with complex trauma exposure and dissociative reactions. The SIMS total score had a sensitivity of 96% but an unacceptably low specificity of 14%. Conclusions: The findings indicate that the instrument is not accurate in assessing potential symptom exaggeration or feigning in DID.

Antecedentes: Los individuos con trastorno de identidad disociativo (TID) tienen síntomas complejos consistentes con reacciones traumáticas severas. Los clínicos y evaluadores forenses se enfrentan al reto de distinguir la exageración de los síntomas y la simulación de los síntomas genuinos entre estos individuos. Esta tarea puede verse facilitada por la administración de medidas de validez.Objetivo: Este estudio tuvo como objetivo documentar la puntuación de los individuos con TID en el Inventario Estructurado de Sintomatología Simulada (SIMS). El segundo objetivo era comparar los simuladores de TID entrenados y los controles sanos con los pacientes de TID en la puntuación total y las subescalas del SIMS. El tercer objetivo fue examinar los índices de utilidad del SIMS para distinguir el TID simulado del TID diagnosticado clínicamente.Método: Se compararon los datos de la SIMS obtenidos de participantes de dos centros holandeses, un centro suizo y un centro estadounidense. Se compararon 63 pacientes de TID con 77 simuladores de TID entrenados y 64 controles sanos en el SIMS. Un análisis multivariante comparó los grupos en las puntuaciones totales y subescalas de la SIMS, y las pruebas post-hoc de Games Howell y los ANOVAs univariantes examinaron las diferencias entre los grupos. Las estadísticas de utilidad evaluaron la precisión de la SIMS para distinguir el TID clínico del simulado.Resultados: Los simuladores de TID obtuvieron puntuaciones significativamente más altas que los individuos con TID y los controles sanos en cada subescala del SIMS, así como en la puntuación total. La mayoría (85,7%) de los individuos con TID puntuaron por encima del punto de corte, que suele interpretarse como indicativo de una posible exageración de los síntomas. Los individuos con TID puntuaron más alto que los controles sanos en todas las subescalas excepto en Inteligencia baja, incluso después de controlar la disociación. Las subescalas y los ítems más frecuentemente respaldados por el grupo de TID son consistentes con los síntomas asociados con la exposición al trauma complejo y las reacciones disociativas. La puntuación total del SIMS tuvo una sensibilidad del 96% pero una especificidad inaceptablemente baja del 14%.Conclusiones: Los resultados indican que el instrumento no es preciso para evaluar la potencial exageración o simulación de los síntomas en el TID.

Schizotypal personality disorder disguised as dissociative identity disorder.

A 20-year-old man was admitted to an inpatient psychiatric unit for self-professed dissociative identity disorder. His presentation of multiple personalities without amnesia, dissociation or depersonalisation led to further examination of personality and cultural factors that may contribute to this uncommon presentation. Careful clinical investigation supported a diagnosis of schizotypal personality disorder with elements of fantastical thinking influenced by media presentations of dissociative identity disorder.

The Dissociative Taxon and Dissociative Identity Disorder.

A total of 491 participants from four previous studies, 443 of whom were diagnosed with dissociative identity disorder (DID) on the Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule, completed the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES). Their results were analyzed to determine how many were in the dissociative taxon (DES-T) on the DES. Of the 443 individuals with DID, 419 (94.6%) were in the taxon, 13 (2.9%) were out of the taxon and 11 (2.5%) were indeterminate. The DES-T is therefore very effective at identifying people with DID as being in the dissociative taxon, although it does have a false negative rate of 5.4%. Out of 48 people with no dissociative disorder on the Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule, the DES-T identified 26 (54.2%) as being in the taxon and 22 (45.8%) as being out of the taxon with no indeterminate cases. The clinical diagnoses of these 48 individuals are unknown: all were inpatients in the same Trauma Program. Thus, the sensitivity of the DES-T for confirming that individuals with DID are in the dissociative taxon was 94.6% and the specificity of the DES-T for confirming that individuals with no dissociative disorder are not in the dissociative taxon was 45.8%. It is possible that the DES-T yields false positives for taxon membership; this possibility should be investigated in future research.

Dissociative identity disorder: out of the shadows at last?

Dissociative identity disorder (DID) is a severely debilitating disorder. Despite recognition in the current and past versions of the DSM, DID remains a controversial psychiatric disorder, which hampers its diagnosis and treatment. Neurobiological evidence regarding the aetiology of DID supports clinical observations that it is a severe form of post-traumatic stress disorder.

Dissociative identity as a continuum from healthy mind to psychiatric disorders: Epistemological and neurophenomenological implications approached through hypnosis.

The topic of multiple personality, redefined as Dissociative Identity Disorders (DIDs) in the DSM-5, is an intriguing and still debated disorder with a long history and deep cultural and epistemological implications, extending up to the idea of possession. Hypnosis is an appealing and valuable model to manipulate subjective experience and get an insight on both the physiology and the pathophysiology of the mind-brain functioning; it and has been closely connected with DIDs and possession since its origin in 18th century and as recently proved the capacity to yield a loss of sense of agency, mimicking delusions of alien control and spirit possession. In this study we report on five very uncommon "hypnotic virtuosos" (HVs) free from any psychiatric disorder, spontaneously undergoing the emergence of multiple identities during neutral hypnosis; this allowed us to check the relationship between their experience and fMRI data. During hypnosis the subjects underwent spontaneous non-intrusive experiences of other selves which were not recalled after the end of the session, due to post-hypnotic amnesia. The fMRI showed a significant decrease of connectivity in the Default Mode Network (DMN) especially between the posterior cingulate cortex and the medial prefrontal cortex. Our results and their contrast with the available data on fMRI in DIDs allows to draw the hypothesis of a continuum between healthy mind - where multiple identities may coexist at unconscious level and may sometimes emerge to the consciousness - and DIDs, where multiple personalities emerge as dissociated, ostensibly autonomous components yielding impaired functioning, subject's loss of control and suffering. If this is the case, it seems more reasonable to refrain from seeking for a clear-cut limit between normality (anyway a conventional, statistical concept) and pathology, and accept a grey area in between, where ostensibly odd but non-pathological experiences may occur (including so-called non-ordinary mental expressions) without calling for treatment but, rather, for being properly understood.

Aiding the diagnosis of dissociative identity disorder: pattern recognition study of brain biomarkers.

BACKGROUND: A diagnosis of dissociative identity disorder (DID) is controversial and prone to under- and misdiagnosis. From the moment of seeking treatment for symptoms to the time of an accurate diagnosis of DID individuals received an average of four prior other diagnoses and spent 7 years, with reports of up to 12 years, in mental health services. AIM: To investigate whether data-driven pattern recognition methodologies applied to structural brain images can provide biomarkers to aid DID diagnosis. METHOD: Structural brain images of 75 participants were included: 32 female individuals with DID and 43 matched healthy controls. Individuals with DID were recruited from psychiatry and psychotherapy out-patient clinics. Probabilistic pattern classifiers were trained to discriminate cohorts based on measures of brain morphology. RESULTS: The pattern classifiers were able to accurately discriminate between individuals with DID and healthy controls with high sensitivity (72%) and specificity (74%) on the basis of brain structure. These findings provide evidence for a biological basis for distinguishing between DID-affected and healthy individuals. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a pattern of neuroimaging biomarkers that could be used to inform the identification of individuals with DID from healthy controls at the individual level. This is important and clinically relevant because the DID diagnosis is controversial and individuals with DID are often misdiagnosed. Ultimately, the application of pattern recognition methodologies could prevent unnecessary suffering of individuals with DID because of an earlier accurate diagnosis, which will facilitate faster and targeted interventions. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Detecting clinical and simulated dissociative identity disorder with the Test of Memory Malingering.

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have assessed malingering in individuals with complex trauma and dissociation. This is concerning because these individuals' severe and ranging symptoms are associated with elevations on some, but not all, validity scales that detect symptom exaggeration. Dissociative individuals may experience dissociative amnesia, yet no study to date has examined how to distinguish clinical from malingered amnesia with dissociative samples. The current study examined whether the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) can accurately distinguish patients with clinically diagnosed dissociative identity disorder (DID) and simulators coached to imitate DID. METHOD: Utility statistics classify individuals' TOMM scores as suggestive of clinical or simulated DID. TOMM scores from 31 patients diagnosed with DID via structured interviews were compared to those of 74 coached DID simulators. RESULTS: Discriminant analyses found scores from TOMM Trials 1 and 2 and total TOMM scores accurately classified clinical or simulated DID group status. In addition, TOMM Trial 1 demonstrated high specificity (87%) and positive predictive power (94%), as well as moderate sensitivity (78%), negative predictive power (63%), and overall diagnostic power (81%). Despite exposure to DID-specific information, simulators were not able to accurately feign the DID group's TOMM scores, which is inconsistent with the iatrogenic/sociocultural model of DID. CONCLUSION: The TOMM shows promise as useful in clinical and forensic contexts to detect memory malingering among DID simulators without sacrificing specificity. Accurate distinction between genuine and feigned complex trauma-related symptoms, including dissociative memory, is integral to the accurate diagnosis of traumatized populations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Rorschach Assessment of Two Distinctive Personality States of a Person With Dissociative Identity Disorder.

This case study used test data from a patient with Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID; American Psychiatric Association, 2013 ) to illustrate how two main personality states of the patient ("Ann" and "Ben") seemed to function. The Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS; Meyer, Viglione, Mihura, Erard, & Erdberg, 2011 ) and the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-Circumplex (IIP-64; Horowitz, Alden, Wiggins, & Pincus, 2000 ), administered to Ann and Ben in separate settings, exposed two diverse R-PAS and IIP-64 profiles. Ann's R-PAS profile suggested an intellectualized style of information processing with few indications of psychological problems. Ben's profile indicated severe perceptual, cognitive, and interpersonal difficulties combined with suspicion and anxiety. Ann's IIP-64 profile suggested minor interpersonal problems, whereas Ben's indicated serious relational difficulties. The findings were discussed in relation to the theory of trauma-related structural dissociation of the personality (van der Hart, Nijenhuis, & Steele, 2006 ), which implies an enduring split in the organization of the personality with more or less separate entities with their own sense of self, perception of the world, and ways of organizing emotional, cognitive, and social functions. The DID personality structure is seen as a defense strategy and as a pathway in the personality development producing serious psychological pain and symptoms.

[What is "normal"? Maternal parenting behavior as risk and protective factor for psychopathology and identity diffusion]. / Was ist noch "normal"? Mütterliches Erziehungsverhalten als Puffer und Risikofaktor für das Auftreten von psychischen Störungen und Identitätsdiffusion.

What is "normal"? Maternal parenting behavior as risk and protective factor for psychopathology and identity diffusion Objectives: This study analyzes the implications of today's highly altered maternal parenting behaviors on children's development and psychological health. METHODS: The relationship between maternal parenting behaviors (support, psychological control, and anxious monitoring) and delayed identity development or identity diffusion as well as internalizing or externalizing symptomatology was investigated in a sample of 732 youths (301 adolescents, 351 young adults, and 80 patients). Cluster analysis identified two types of maternal parenting behaviors: authoritative maternal behavior and dysfunctionalmaternal behavior. RESULTS: As expected, patients exhibited a high degree of dysfunctional maternal parenting behavior (low support, high psychological control), delayed identity development as well as elevated identity diffusion and symptomatology.Authoritative maternal parenting emerged as a protective factor in the prediction of identity diffusion and symptomatology.All three groups described a high degree of anxious maternal monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: The implications of changed maternal parenting behaviors on identity diffusion and symptomatology are discussed in light of societal changes and changing criteria of personality disorders in the new DSM-5.

"Yo soy tres". A propósito de un caso de trastorno de identidad disociativo / "I am three". A case of dissociative identity disorder

Objetivo. Actualización del trastorno de identidad disociativo a través de la presentación de un caso y la revisión teórica del concepto. Caso clínico. Varón de 17 años internado en Unidad de Agudos por intento autolítico que a lo largo del ingreso manifiesta la coexistencia de tres identidades subjetivas de manera alterna, junto a episodios de alteración de la memoria e inestabilidad emocional. Resultados. Tanto las entrevistas clínicas como la evolución del caso confirman la existencia de un trastorno de identidad disociativo con una base traumática en relación con acontecimientos altamente estresantes en la primera infancia y un establecimiento patológico del apego con los cuidadores principales. Conclusiones. El trastorno de identidad disociativo es una psicopatología compleja caracterizada por alteraciones en la memoria e identidad. Resulta interesante considerar la prevalencia de patología de tipo disociativo en unidades de hospitalización de adolescentes, en su gran mayoría vinculadas a experiencias traumáticas tempranas

Objective. To present an update on dissociative identity disorder through the presentation of a case and a theoretical review of the concept. Clinical case. A 17-year-old male admitted to the Acute Unit due to a suicide attempt, that during his admission manifested the coexistence of three subjective identities alternately, together with episodes of memory alteration and emotional instability. Results. Both the clinical interviews and the evolution of the case confirm the existence of a Dissociative Identity Disorder with a traumatic basis in relation to highly stressful events in early childhood and a pathological establishment of attachment with the main caregivers. Conclusions. Dissociative identity disorder is a complex psychopathology characterised by alterations in memory and identity. It is of interest to consider the prevalence of dissociative pathology in adolescent hospitalisation units, most of them linked to early traumatic experiences

[Approach to the Development of Mind and Persona].

OBJECTIVES: To access medical specialists by health specialists working in the regional health field, the possibility of utilizing the voice approach for dissociative identity disorder (DID) patients as a health assessment for medical access (HAMA) was investigated. The first step is to investigate whether the plural personae in a single DID patient can be discriminated by voice analysis. METHODS: Voices of DID patients including these with different personae were extracted from YouTube and were analysed using the software PRAAT with basic frequency, oral factors, chin factors and tongue factors. In addition, RAKUGO story teller voices made artificially and dramatically were analysed in the same manner. Quantitive and qualitative analysis method were carried out and nested logistic regression and a nested generalized linear model was developed. RESULTS: The voice from different personae in one DID patient could be visually and easily distinquished using basic frequency curve, cluster analysis and factor analysis. In the canonical analysis, only Roy's maximum root was <0.01. In the nested generalized linear model, the model using a standard deviation (SD) indicator fit best and some other possibilities are shown here. CONCLUSIONS: In DID patients, the short transition time among plural personae could guide to the risky situation such as suicide. So if the voice approach can show the time threshold of changes between the different personae, it would be useful as an Access Assessment in the form of a simple HAMA.